Time for another disclaimer.
Jul 14th, 2007 by Daniel Z.
Since idiots like Jilil seem to not get this simple fact, I will have to post yet another disclaimer so people don’t just stop by the site and believe that my beliefs about Jindal being bad for this state have anything to do with his race.
If an election where to take place today and the two candidates where someone like David Duke or Bobby Jindal I would be casting my vote for Bobby Jindal.
Now, I would think that I would have said this more than enough times for it to sink in. However, I doubt it will sink in. The geniuses who troll this board seem to not get that fact, nor do they get that I don’t care if they call me names. Sticks and stones and all that jazz.
(6 votes, average: 3 out of 5)
Loading ...
Loading ...
What geniuses are on this board ? What anything on this board?
There is no one reading or posting here
Only you the other racist, PointeCoupeDemocrat..
Danny Zimmerman you’re certainly not a genius. You are racist hater, and three time loser in politics.
If your going to stroke yourself, at least unzip your pants.
Jilil: The genius comment was a sarcastic comment about you and trotsky who cannot seem to understand that I do not care about Jindal’s race and that I do not care about comments referring to my OBVIOUS size. By not getting the comment, you just reaffirm your level of “genius”.
And you are correct, I am a racist hater. I hate racists. Though, since you refer to me as a “looser” in another post, I am assuming you meant that I am both a racist and a hater.
Let me ask you this “Jilil”. How is someone a racist if he would vote for Bobby Jindal before he would vote for David Duke? Be honest, try it for once in your life.
Danny, you can’t prove to me or anyone, that you voted for Bobby Jindal.
Danny, you can’t prove to me or anyone that you didn’t vote for Dave Duke.
And your word mean absolutely nothing.
You are a loser, and will away be a loser.
You just another hate filled little “wanna-be”.
Considering I never claimed to have voted for Bobby Jindal your statement is illogical.
Try reading what I wrote again and get back to me.
Have a good day.
For the record, I have never accused you of being a racist, Dan. Just a bigtime loser.
Trotsky: Perhaps i worded it strangly but I didnt meant to say that you accused me of being racist. I meant to say that Jilil is a “genius” for not getting that I would vote for Jindal before I voted for someone like David Duke and that you (Trotsky) are a “genius” for not getting the fact that you calling me fat really doesn’t bother me.
But who is the bigger loser? Is it the person who posts on a website using his own name and who backs up his facts? Or is it the person who posts anonymously and backs him his arguments by calling the other person fat and a loser? I think it that answer is clear.
Dan, what you “hammer” Jindal about on this site is much ado about nothing. It’s simply a conflict of opinion. The way you present your side makes you the biggest loser - trying to make a mountain out of molehills - all the while convinced that your molehills amount to something greater than actual molehills. I’m still waiting for you to provide evidence that his actions have killed people or broke up marriages or something “bad” like that. It doesn’t help your cause that you have been beaten about as bad as a political candidate can ever be beaten by Jindal…TWICE. I understand the emotion you have and your instinct to have a personal vendetta against Jindal, but this site, far from ever being “mainstream,” proves the theorum that you are just a big, fat loser.
Trotsky: You claim that it is much ado about nothing but that is just YOUR opinion. Jindal’s record is built on a mountain of spin and lies and people need to hear the other side of the story.
Now, each individual issue may in and of itself be small. However, the combined sum of all the issues is what he rests his campaign chances on and that is why counteracting each and every one of the lies is something that is imprtant to do.
You can wait until the end of the world for me to provide evidence of him killing people or breaking up marriages because there is no such evidence that I am aware of. However, one does not need to do things like that in order to make that person a bad choice for governor.
I got beaten by Jindal twice? I only ran against him once. Why dont you check your facts before spreading more lies.
And you can keep claiming that I have a vendetta against him as much as you want, that doesn’t make it true. I don’t want Jindal to be my next governor because I have seen through the lies and misleading spin of his campaign. That would still hold true regardless of whether I ran against him or not.
People do want to hear the “other side” of the story, not spin from a two-time loser to the guy whom you are claiming is “bad.” All you are doing is trying to make issues out of non-issues. It amounts to cheap spin on your part, spin that you love to rail against on here. I have yet to see you offer legitimate evidence of Jindal being “bad.” I will admit that you do have some valid political differences with Jindal and you have all the right in the world to present those differences as you see fit, but doing that in the context of a hate website is about as counterproductive as one can get…unless it is your desire to just trash Jindal at all costs for beating you TWICE.
Oh, and he did wax you at the polls twice - once as an obnoxious blowhard in 2004 and the second time in 2006 when you were running another bad mouther’s campaign. I don’t know why you are ashamed of losing that race, but proud of losing the first one, but then again, it’s hard to rationalize anything you have been doing as of late, Dan.
Trotsky: The name of the site, JindalIsBad.com, is a spoof on the name of the name JindalIsGood.com. I have said this repeatedly yet you just don’t seem to get it.
You may feel that the issues I discuss are non-issues and that is your right. Others, when I speak to them about Jindal, disagree.
You may feel that I am bringing cheap spin, I am claiming that the Jindal campaign is nothing but cheap spin.
When you claimed that I lost to Jindal twice, that implied that I ran against him twice. Now you are waivering on that and saying that my being a campaign manager counts as a “loss” as well. Will you call me a three time loser if he wins this election? If so, you are the joke sir.
Now, when I ran against Jindal I ran an issues based campaign. I did question Jindal’s record but I also brought forward some solutions to the problems that I felt where important. I don’t define that as being an obnoxious blowhard but hey, it is obvious that you dislike me and my politics so you are obviously biased. People who read anything you say on this forum will take your words as a grain of salt.
The bottom line is this. You take my words against Jindal as being less credible because I lost to him and you think I have some sort of vendetta. The owner of this site obviously believes otherwise. He must believe that because I have ran against him in the past that I am probably more likely to know what I am talking about when it comes to Bobby Jindal because I would have had to research him in the election.
The readers of this blog are free to believe what they want to believe. If they believe you, so be it. If they believe me, then great. But you constantly making personal attacks against me does not help you to look credible whatsoever.
Just because you pirated the idea for this site’s name from another site doesn’t mean that your main objective with this site is any different than the title states. Are you in fact acknowledging that this site is a spoof and satire? Your goal is to in fact show Jindal is “bad.” You really haven’t done that. Of course, you have rallied the already anti-Jindal troops to the cause by playing semantic games with statements and making mountains out of molehills. But you have done nothing to convince anyone that isn’t already convinced that Jindal is “bad.”
Your obsession with playing semantic games has gotten you all worked up about my statements that you were waxed twice by Jindal in two successive elections. Candidates and their campaign managers are inseparable in terms of successes, thus you are considered a LOSER in both contests by virtue of your intimate involvement in one as a candidate and the other as a hack campaign advisor.
You will not be considered a three-time loser if Jindal wins this election because you are not running any one of his opponents’ campaigns. If you were, then it could be argued that you would be a three-time loser, although much of that “loser” status should be spread around to the other losing candidates and their senior staffs. You sitting behind a computer, bending over backwards to spin semantics to attempt to make Jindal look “bad” with the “content” you deem “worthwhile” on this site will have veeeeery little to NOTHING to do with preventing Jindal from winning (as he seems poised to do at this point). So in a very indirect way, you could be said to be a THREE TIME LOSER due to your efforts with this website, but being an objective, rational person, I wouldn’t make such a claim, as tempting as it may be.
You are an obnoxious blowhard, which is why you got such a paltry amount of votes directly in 2004 and indirectly in 2006. That is why no serious Democrat candidate wants you as an active member of their campaign. Yes, you will probably go door-to-door for a candidate or two on a Saturday this fall, but as far as having any influence with any serious candidate, Campbell and Boasso wouldn’t touch you with a ten foot pole. You do in fact fill a very valuable role to the Democrat election machine by being a fringe badmouther of one candidate. Personally, I would find such a role pathetic and degrading, but to someone like you who is obnoxious and prone to emotional exaggerations and illogical conclusions AND who is unabashedly partisan, you are an ideal “blogger” for this “anti” role you fit so well into.
You falling back to this perceived moral high ground by crying about “personal attacks” is almost as pathetic as your degrading yourself by blogging here. You mentioned constantly how you embrace your being fat, so how can you cry about being called fat with a straight face? As far as your being a loser, that is what you are. You haven’t won anything except a seat on the Jefferson Parish Democratic PEC, which, considering how few Democrats are in JP, is hardly an accomplishment. You’ve lost both elections when it counted, getting no greater than four per-cent. Unless you can validly claim you won those elections, you are a loser.
“Just because you pirated the idea for this site’s name from another site doesn’t mean that your main objective with this site is any different than the title states. ”
But the name of the site also doesn’t have the meaning that you are assigning to it. Both sites discuss the quality of choice that Bobby Jindal is for Governor. One says that he is a good choice and the other says he is a bad choice. You are taking the name of the site literally in that he is bad in general.
“Of course, you have rallied the already anti-Jindal troops to the cause by playing semantic games with statements and making mountains out of molehills. But you have done nothing to convince anyone that isn’t already convinced that Jindal is “bad.””
Actually, I have spoken to many people about Bobby Jindal and when I tell them the truth about him they change their minds. The fact of the matter is that Jindal has made mountains of out molehills by elevating his accomplishments and misleading the voters about his record.
“You are an obnoxious blowhard, which is why you got such a paltry amount of votes directly in 2004 and indirectly in 2006. ”
Actually, I attribute the majority of the reason for my loss in 2004 (and for Davids loss in 2006) as an inability to raise funds. When I spoke to people 1 on 1 I convinced many of them that what they had heard about Jindal was all wrong. I just didn’t have enough money to get that message to as many people as I could.
I spent $3000 bucks in the 2004 campaign and got over 12,000 votes. I don’t view that as bad at all.
“Yes, you will probably go door-to-door for a candidate or two on a Saturday this fall, but as far as having any influence with any serious candidate, Campbell and Boasso wouldn’t touch you with a ten foot pole.”
Actually, I have spoken to two of the three major candidates opposing Jindal and both appreciate the content of the site and the third has used my arguments verbatim on his website. My hard work researching Jindal and reporting on his true record will help them in the upcoming election. The impact this site has might not be quantifiable. However, do not fool yourself into thinking that people are unaware of this site.
“You mentioned constantly how you embrace your being fat, so how can you cry about being called fat with a straight face? ”
I am not crying about being called fat. I am telling you that you look like an idiot for making fun of my size when I have already made fun of my own size on this and other forums already.
You are correct that when it comes to elections, so far I have lost. But in the grand scheme of things I am a winner in life. I have a great job, a wonderful wife, generally good health (amazing because of my size, I know.. but my blood pressure and cholestorol levels are perfect), and great friends. I have absolutely nothing to complain about. I am happy where I am in life regardless of my electoral losses. And I even view those losses as learning experiences that have given me insight into things I never would have known had I not decided to participate in the electoral process. I love learning new things and meeting new people. And when I see something that needs to be said (like the lack of candidates making coastal restoration and hurricane protection their top priority in 2004) I stood up and tried to make a difference. So regardless of whether I succeeded, at least I made the effort and tried.
But see, apparantly you dont seem to be able to grasp the concept that I am not someone who defines my life by politics. Politics is a hobby, it is something I enjoy debating and participating in. The fact that I know a lot about Jindal and his record is a side effect of me running in the 2004 election.
Perhaps one day I will run again because I do want to make a positive impact to the community I live in. But I have so many other wonderful things going on in my life that even if I where to never win any elections, I would still consider my life to be a success. This is why your behavior here is amusing. You try and tear me down but there is absolutely nothing your pathetic little troll behavior could ever hope to do that will cause me to shed a tear.
Stop trying to make this into a big “feel sorry for Dan, he catches tons of flak for doing a service” pity party. You are trying to interject yourself into the debate of ideas in the most deliberately antagonistic way. Don’t go cry when someone takes an objective look at the information you put out into public discourse and picks it apart. The good people who are similarly involved in the process tend to respond favorably to such a thing and either clarify their statements or try to find better evidence. You, like President Bush, just sit around sticking to your guns, completely oblivious to the weakness and stupidity of some of the claims you are making.
If you wouldn’t be so outright hostile from the jump, you would likely get a better response to some of the things you say, but you start everything on here with the premise that there is a hidden truth, but you have not once uncovered any of these supposed truths. All you have done is provide conspiracy theories and conjecture to mask the fact that EVERYTHING you bitch about Jindal in regards to is merely a difference in political opinion. Why don’t you get your own blog and call it “DanZimmerman’s Progressive Ideas for a Brighter Louisiana” blog. I can guarantee you that if you were trying to reach out to voters in that way you might actually make a difference, rather than make people laugh.
Nobody is trying to make this into a Dan pity party. There is no reason to pity me, I am quite happy. I cannot help that you enjoy erecting strawmen.
You call the way you counter my arguments as objective? That is the funniest thing ive heard all day!
And now you are comparing me to Bush? That is just plain laughable. I don’t stick with the same evidence, I am finding new evidence about Jindal every week. That claim is laughable too.
There are hidden truths. Look at the thread about the Republican Party proving me right! They purposefully leave out the fact that Jindal voted against the bill with the dead zone dollars in their attempt to mislead people that Jindal secured those funds for us.
But people who would just normally believe what the GOP tells them, and who wouldnt follow the link to the article and bother to read it, would just think that the link is there to give credit and believe that they are getting the whole story. This is why sites like this are needed, to debunk the myth.
And I am not the one with conspiracy theories. In the debate about the health record, I am the one who brought solid evidence. You argued with “mights” and “maybes”. You are one of the people who promoted the conspiracy that I was behind the Tony G. campaign. So don’t talk to me about conspiracies when you use lies and conjecture to try and win your point.
Your tactics are sad, pathetic and transparent.
If you believe that Jindal is “bad” based on the stuff you post here, then the only thing sad, pathetic, and transparent is you, Dan Zimmerman, the two-time loser. The only thing more “sad, pathetic, and transparent” than that is the fact that you seriously believe that the people of Louisiana should adhere to your thesis on Jindal based on the evidence linked on this website. I don’t know what’s worse - you or the low standards you must apparently assume Louisianans have to be swayed by the crap you post on this website.
I think Jindal is a bad choice for governor because his record is full of lies and misleading spin and there is absolutely no evidence that he would be a good governor.
That’s a fantastic opinion of yours, which you are entitled to by all means, but unless you start posting some real evidence that does not amount to just semantic nitpickiness and illogical overreaching, you are going to continue looking like an obsessed loser with a vendetta.
1. Continually votes against Lousianans. ie HR 800 and 2643 and the Iraqi War Bill
2. Duped constituentcy into believing that he wanted to be their representative in the US Congress. Miracously he determined the day after his reelection he wanted to be Governor of Louisiana.
3. While serving as a second term Congressman he spent the majority of his time in other Districts canvassing for votes in his Gubernatorial bid. Leaving his District for all practical purposes unrepresented.
There’s no vendetta here just an urgency to make sure people have an alternative view of the facts. The truth of the matter is most mainstream publications always stop short of revealing the whole story. Folks like you who blind to the truth are the opposite end of the spectrum. I have read your writings elsewhere and believe me it almost sounds like your fruit for him but I realize you’re just overly impressed. Every story has two sides. You chastise people for expressing theirs. I guess that’s in your communist nature. I’ll put it to you, if Jindal is that good what difference does it make what I say or anybody else for that matter? You can belittle me and my efforts all you want, it only shows the immaturity you posesses as a supposed adult. Perhaps you were promised a ride on the Bobby Jindal bus, I don’t know. All I can tell you is potna you’re no better than anybody else. Neither is your candidate.
Trotsky: Just as you say it is my opinion that he has provided no evidence that he would be a good governor, it is simply your opinion that the evidence I have provided is semantic nitpickyness or illogical overreaching. And no matter how many times you say it, it doesn’t make it anything more than your opinion. I believe that voting against louisiana and continuing to lie about how he saved the louisiana department of health are big issues. If you think that lying about your record and voting against louisiana are not big issues then that is your opinion and you are entitled to it!