Jindal on E.W.E.
Aug 3rd, 2007 by Daniel Z.
Bobby Jindal was recently asked about whether he opposed the possible commutation of Edwin Edwards’ sentance.
You can here the audio here.
Why can’t he give a simple “yes” or “no” on whether EWE should be allowed to leave Jail early? Since he refused to say that he WAS opposed to his sentance being commuted, should we believe that he is not opposed to the idea? Seems like a pretty easy question to answer.
Jindal claims to be supportive of ethics. His failure to give a resounding “no, Edwards should not be let out of Jail early” makes it impossible to take Jindal seriously on ethics.
(8 votes, average: 3 out of 5)
Loading ...
Loading ...
Hmm…. Did Jindal ever take a position on Scooter Libby’s pardon? Because in that case the “non-political process” in the Justice Department was ignored altogether.
Yall need to get a life. Your talking about a subject in which you don’t have a clue. You think you do ….BUT YOU DON”T!!!!
GET A LIFE!!
You need to get a life. You’re talking about asubject in which you don’t have a clue! …..You think you do but YOU DON”T!!
Take your religion bias glasses off and search the real true. You don’t ask a liar and thief if he is telling the rtruth…do you???
Man get a life. If want to know the truth. Read the ” Trial of Blood”.
That is FACT and HISTORY!
You bunch of Moroons!!!! May GOD have mercy on your souls!!!!
Im sorry Mark, but I don’t see how Bobby Jindal can be serious on ethical reform and be wishy washy on the question on whether E.W.E. should be released early or not.
This topic is not about religion, and I don’t have “religion bias”.
And it is really sad that you view people who want the best for their state as having no life.