Comments on: Jindal: No abortions, no exceptions. http://www.jindalisbad.com/jindal-no-abortions-no-exceptions/ Learn the truth about Bobby Jindal Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:11:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5 by: David Stolz http://www.jindalisbad.com/jindal-no-abortions-no-exceptions/#comment-46434 Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:36:03 +0000 http://www.jindalisbad.com/jindal-no-abortions-no-exceptions/#comment-46434 Bobby Jindll DOESNT HAVE IT!He's a pahetic example of what the GOP has become:Nerds,Neoconservative War Nuts,Wall Street spectulators,and of course the religious fundementilists.Too ban all abortians is beyond all reason,all practicality,and all decency.Barry Goldwater,and even Roald Reagan NEVER advocated that!In fact Reagan liberalized Californias abortion law,as governor in 1967.But thats before the Republican party was the AMERICAN TALIBAN. Bobby Jindll DOESNT HAVE IT!He’s a pahetic example of what the GOP has become:Nerds,Neoconservative War Nuts,Wall Street spectulators,and of course the religious fundementilists.Too ban all abortians is beyond all reason,all practicality,and all decency.Barry Goldwater,and even Roald Reagan NEVER advocated that!In fact Reagan liberalized Californias abortion law,as governor in 1967.But thats before the Republican party was the AMERICAN TALIBAN.

]]> by: Daniel Z. http://www.jindalisbad.com/jindal-no-abortions-no-exceptions/#comment-31920 Tue, 03 Mar 2009 05:42:26 +0000 http://www.jindalisbad.com/jindal-no-abortions-no-exceptions/#comment-31920 J: Your position is one held by only 4% of Americans. Most people would not force a woman to die in pregnancy. Most people would not force a rape victim to "keep it". Most Americans are not that cruel. J: Your position is one held by only 4% of Americans. Most people would not force a woman to die in pregnancy. Most people would not force a rape victim to “keep it”. Most Americans are not that cruel.

]]> by: J Hart http://www.jindalisbad.com/jindal-no-abortions-no-exceptions/#comment-31904 Mon, 02 Mar 2009 08:44:33 +0000 http://www.jindalisbad.com/jindal-no-abortions-no-exceptions/#comment-31904 Governor Jindal's position on abortion is the only real pro-life position. If you say you are pro-life because of the fact that a baby in the womb is a living human, then you must then say that killing the baby in the womb for any reason is wrong. Being only pro-life except for incest, rape, mother's life, etc. is just a contradiction of one's reason for being pro-life in the first place. Governor Jindal’s position on abortion is the only real pro-life position. If you say you are pro-life because of the fact that a baby in the womb is a living human, then you must then say that killing the baby in the womb for any reason is wrong. Being only pro-life except for incest, rape, mother’s life, etc. is just a contradiction of one’s reason for being pro-life in the first place.

]]> by: Apedike http://www.jindalisbad.com/jindal-no-abortions-no-exceptions/#comment-30161 Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:12:40 +0000 http://www.jindalisbad.com/jindal-no-abortions-no-exceptions/#comment-30161 I agree with this article. Bobby Jindal's opinions seemed to be formed based on religion rather than reasoning. He should think about rape victims. The rate of rape has increased in the past 50 years. Therefore there should be abortions. The baby won't have a good life, being raised by a mom who didn't want him/her in the first place. I agree with this article. Bobby Jindal’s opinions seemed to be formed based on religion rather than reasoning. He should think about rape victims. The rate of rape has increased in the past 50 years. Therefore there should be abortions. The baby won’t have a good life, being raised by a mom who didn’t want him/her in the first place.

]]> by: Liberty and Justice for all! » Blog Archive » People blinded, letter to the T-P just doesn’t get it. http://www.jindalisbad.com/jindal-no-abortions-no-exceptions/#comment-13648 Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:50:03 +0000 http://www.jindalisbad.com/jindal-no-abortions-no-exceptions/#comment-13648 [...] This cannot be further from the truth. First of all, if Bobby Jindal wasn’t an extremist woman hating social conservative, he would not have been embraced by the Republican party as much as he was. And had Bobby Jindal not lied about being a “born again Christian”, perhaps people in the north would not have voted for the Catholic Jindal. [...] […] This cannot be further from the truth. First of all, if Bobby Jindal wasn’t an extremist woman hating social conservative, he would not have been embraced by the Republican party as much as he was. And had Bobby Jindal not lied about being a “born again Christian”, perhaps people in the north would not have voted for the Catholic Jindal. […]

]]> by: Dan Z. http://www.jindalisbad.com/jindal-no-abortions-no-exceptions/#comment-304 Sat, 10 Feb 2007 00:33:30 +0000 http://www.jindalisbad.com/jindal-no-abortions-no-exceptions/#comment-304 Well, I am sure his stance on RU-486 is the same as his stance on abortion (since RU-486 is the "abortion pill"). I have never heard him (or read about him) incorrectly mistaking RU-486 for the morning after pill. Well, I am sure his stance on RU-486 is the same as his stance on abortion (since RU-486 is the “abortion pill”). I have never heard him (or read about him) incorrectly mistaking RU-486 for the morning after pill.

]]> by: jindalisbad http://www.jindalisbad.com/jindal-no-abortions-no-exceptions/#comment-303 Fri, 09 Feb 2007 13:57:11 +0000 http://www.jindalisbad.com/jindal-no-abortions-no-exceptions/#comment-303 I was thinking more on the lines his stance on RU-486 vs. his stance on abortion. I was thinking more on the lines his stance on RU-486 vs. his stance on abortion.

]]> by: Dan Z. http://www.jindalisbad.com/jindal-no-abortions-no-exceptions/#comment-301 Fri, 09 Feb 2007 03:30:57 +0000 http://www.jindalisbad.com/jindal-no-abortions-no-exceptions/#comment-301 Which would? The fact that Jindal, the supposed medical expert, doesn't even know simple medical terms and definitions? Or the fact that many on the right wing wrongly refer to the morning after pill as "RU-486" in their efforts to mislead the public? I think both would make great blog posts :) Which would? The fact that Jindal, the supposed medical expert, doesn’t even know simple medical terms and definitions?

Or the fact that many on the right wing wrongly refer to the morning after pill as “RU-486″ in their efforts to mislead the public?

I think both would make great blog posts :)

]]> by: jindalisbad http://www.jindalisbad.com/jindal-no-abortions-no-exceptions/#comment-299 Thu, 08 Feb 2007 22:27:27 +0000 http://www.jindalisbad.com/jindal-no-abortions-no-exceptions/#comment-299 Ooooh that would be a great blog post!!! Ooooh that would be a great blog post!!!

]]> by: Dan Z. http://www.jindalisbad.com/jindal-no-abortions-no-exceptions/#comment-297 Thu, 08 Feb 2007 04:02:43 +0000 http://www.jindalisbad.com/jindal-no-abortions-no-exceptions/#comment-297 Sure! "Mendell's note referred to Gambit Weekly's Nov. 4 endorsement of Bobby Jindal, which noted that Jindal supports making what this paper called "emergency room contraception" available to rape victims. These events illustrate the general confusion surrounding emergency contraception." http://www.bestofneworleans.com/dispatch/2003-12-02/feat4.html And this just goes to show that Jindal is willing to misuse terms in order to make his point. Instead of calling it the "Morning After Pill" (which many confuse with RU-486... a completely different pill), he incorrectly calls the MAP "emergency room contraception". I asked him a question on WTIX 690 when Jeff Crouere had him on as a guest. I asked him about what he felt about a woman with an ectopic pregnancy. The procedure that Jindal described in an endorsement of treatement for that condition was the most invasive of all the available procedures. The only reason he supported it is because that procedure did not "target the embryo, so it wouldnt be considered an abortion". In reallity, an abortion is the termination of a pregnancy, regardless of the cause. So he doesn't use the correct definition of abortion and he doesn't know the correct term for the morning after pill. Some healthcare expert, huh? Sure!

“Mendell’s note referred to Gambit Weekly’s Nov. 4 endorsement of Bobby Jindal, which noted that Jindal supports making what this paper called “emergency room contraception” available to rape victims. These events illustrate the general confusion surrounding emergency contraception.”

http://www.bestofneworleans.com/dispatch/2003-12-02/feat4.html

And this just goes to show that Jindal is willing to misuse terms in order to make his point. Instead of calling it the “Morning After Pill” (which many confuse with RU-486… a completely different pill), he incorrectly calls the MAP “emergency room contraception”.

I asked him a question on WTIX 690 when Jeff Crouere had him on as a guest. I asked him about what he felt about a woman with an ectopic pregnancy. The procedure that Jindal described in an endorsement of treatement for that condition was the most invasive of all the available procedures. The only reason he supported it is because that procedure did not “target the embryo, so it wouldnt be considered an abortion”. In reallity, an abortion is the termination of a pregnancy, regardless of the cause.

So he doesn’t use the correct definition of abortion and he doesn’t know the correct term for the morning after pill. Some healthcare expert, huh?

]]>